Skip to content

yes: align buf, improve |pv>/dev/null#11420

Closed
oech3 wants to merge 1 commit intouutils:mainfrom
oech3:yes-align
Closed

yes: align buf, improve |pv>/dev/null#11420
oech3 wants to merge 1 commit intouutils:mainfrom
oech3:yes-align

Conversation

@oech3
Copy link
Contributor

@oech3 oech3 commented Mar 19, 2026

Closes #11415 . Split #11294

$ timeout 20 taskset -c 2 target/release/yes-align | pv>/dev/null
92.2GiB
$ timeout 20 taskset -c 2 target/release/yes-main | pv>/dev/null
89.6GiB

@oech3 oech3 marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2026 20:13
@oech3 oech3 force-pushed the yes-align branch 2 times, most recently from 7cdd445 to 25f099f Compare March 21, 2026 16:53
@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/cut/bounded-memory (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/dd/no-allocate is now passing!

@github-actions
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/date/resolution (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/cut/bounded-memory is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/unexpand/bounded-memory is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Congrats! The gnu test tests/rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM is now passing!

@oech3 oech3 closed this Mar 23, 2026
@oech3 oech3 deleted the yes-align branch March 23, 2026 01:41
@oech3
Copy link
Contributor Author

oech3 commented Mar 23, 2026

No need for memfd or pipe approach

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

yes: allocate aligned Vec

1 participant